One of the challenges of fitness for purpose


A common definition of quality data is data that is fit for purpose.

Last week, I suggested that Steinhoff’s accounting shenanigans can be attributed (at least in part) to poor data quality and, more directly, to poor governance.

Francois Marais’s Response to ‘a Steinhoff guide for dummies’ gives non-financial experts an understanding of what Steinhoff were doing.

Is this really a data quality problem?

It depends on your perspective – or, in my judgement, your purpose.

If you were the Steinhoff accountants trying to present a more positive face to the world – then the data was of good quality.

If, on the other hand, you were an investor or a creditor, then the numbers were arguably of a poor quality.

A great example of how data can appear to be of good quality until it needs to be used for another purpose

In recent news – Steinhoff 2016 results also need to be restated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s