Introduction:
The Olympic Games have captivated the world’s attention in recent weeks. Were you left disappointed or pleasantly surprised by your country’s final medal count? Let’s delve deeper into the numbers and uncover the real story – how poor data quality impacted the predictions

---

Struggling to get investment for data quality? We explore the implications and opportunities of data quality.

---

Medal Tally and Predictions:
South Africa secured a total of 6 medals at the Games: 3 golds, 2 silvers, and a bronze. These results align closely with the predictions made by knowledgeable commentators before the competition commenced.

Surprises and Unforeseen Outcomes:
However, the path to these victories was far from predictable. While swimmer Cameron van den Burgh and javelin thrower Sunette Viljoen were strong contenders for gold based on their performance records, their actual results fell short. Viljoen ended up in 4th place in her event, struggling on the night, while van den Burgh secured a stunning gold medal, breaking the world record. On the other hand, mountain biker Burry Stander, the men’s 4x400m relay team, and other hopefuls faced unexpected challenges and couldn’t achieve the anticipated medals.

Unlikely Champions:
Interestingly, South Africa’s gold medals came from unexpected sources. Swimming sensation Chad le Clos created a sensation by defeating Olympic legend Michael Phelps, surpassing the expectations of the US team. Another surprising triumph came from the previously underestimated men’s lightweight fours rowers, who outperformed the highly regarded British team.

Unveiling the Incomplete Data:
Ultimately, it’s important to acknowledge that the data itself was not inaccurate, but rather incomplete. The British team, perceived as the favourites, struggled with crosswinds on the day of the race, affecting their performance. Likewise, Michael Phelps, the anticipated winner, miscalculated his timing at the end, costing him a fraction of a second too long. These unforeseen factors highlight the limitations of relying solely on limited data for accurate predictions.

The Impact of Data Quality:
The Olympic Games serve as a reminder that poor data quality poses significant challenges for decision-makers. One notable example was the Women’s Hammer Throw, where Betty Heidler’s bronze-winning throw of 77.12 meters was initially lost in the system. Despite the clear evidence on television that her throw was nearly equal to the silver medalist’s, the data discrepancy was rectified, ensuring accurate results. This incident emphasizes the need for regular data quality assessments to identify and address any potential issues that could lead to erroneous decision-making.

Conclusion:
In the realm of sports, as in any other field, data is a valuable asset that must be treated with care. While data provides insights and predictions, it cannot capture the full range of variables and unexpected circumstances that shape the outcomes. By understanding the limitations of data and ensuring its quality, decision-makers can make more informed choices, avoiding potential pitfalls caused by incomplete or misleading information.

Data quality isn’t just a buzzword; it’s a vital component that can make or break success. But have you ever wondered: Can data be a liability? Understanding this question is crucial for navigating the modern landscape.

But let’s delve deeper: how does data quality add value? This isn’t just a theoretical concept. It’s a practical reality that impacts your bottom line.