Data is the lifeblood of information-driven businesses and organizations.

It fuels everything from targeted marketing campaigns to artificial intelligence algorithms, driving decision-making processes and shaping the way we interact with the digital world. This is why it is so important to ensure a sound business case for data quality.

However, not all data is created equal. There’s a fundamental distinction between two types of data that can have a profound impact on individuals and society as a whole: “creepy data” and “first-person data.”

Table of Contents

• Understanding Creepy Data
• Is all Third-Person Data Creepy?
• Creepy data practices
• The Importance of First-Person Data
• The Impact on Data Quality
• The Ethical Imperative
• The Impact of Creepy Data on Customer Experience
• The AIDA Framework: Attention, Interest, Desire, Action
• Conclusion
• FAQs

Understanding Creepy Data

Creepy data is a term that sends shivers down the spine of privacy advocates and everyday internet users alike. It refers to information collected about individuals without their knowledge or consent, often in a manner that is intrusive or unethical. Creepy data encompasses various forms of personal information, including browsing habits, location data, and online activities, all gathered stealthily without the individual’s awareness or understanding of how their data is being used.

The term itself, “creepy data,” aptly captures the discomfort and unease that people feel when they discover that their personal information has been harvested and repurposed without their consent. This unease arises from practices such as targeted advertising, covert surveillance, and the sale of personal data to third parties, all conducted under the radar of those being surveilled.

Creepy data doesn’t stop at basic online tracking. It extends into the realm of advanced technologies like facial recognition and biometric data collection, which can further invade an individual’s privacy and exacerbate the sense of unease. The lack of transparency, consent, or clear boundaries surrounding the collection and utilization of creepy data raises profound ethical concerns.

Is all Third-Person Data Creepy?

The terms “creepy data” and “third-person data” are both used to describe types of data collected via indirect means. However, these two types of data share different characteristics, as explored below:

Aspect	Creepy Data	Third-Person Data
Collection	Information collected without knowledge or consent, often stealthily and intrusively	Data collected legally with consent and awareness
Examples	Browsing habits, location data, online activities, facial recognition, biometric data	Demographic info, publicly available data, external database data
Ethics	Raises ethical concerns due to lack of transparency and consent	Generally considered ethical when complying with regulations and consent
Impact	Can make individuals uncomfortable, leading to privacy concerns	Often used for legitimate purposes without causing discomfort

The key difference between creepy data and third-person data lies in how the data is collected, the level of transparency and consent involved, and the ethical considerations.

Creepy data practices

Creepy data practices typically make people feel uncomfortable or violated (and may actually be illegal). Some examples include:

• Ambient listening: This is a practice where devices such as smart speakers or smartphones listen to and record conversations in the background without the user’s knowledge or consent
• Collection of sensitive information: Collecting personal information such as health data, financial information, or location data without a clear reason or consent can be considered creepy
• Data hoarding: Collecting large amounts of data without a clear purpose or justification can be seen as creepy
• Data mining: Using personal data to make assumptions about people’s behaviour or preferences can be seen as creepy.
• Lack of transparency: When companies collect data without being transparent about what they are collecting or how they are using it, it can be seen as creepy

The Importance of First-Person Data

In contrast, first-person data represents a more transparent and ethical approach to data collection. This type of data is willingly provided by individuals who are aware of what information they are sharing and for what purpose. First-person data is a conscious and explicit exchange of personal information, often accompanied by clear terms and conditions regarding its use.

First-person data empowers individuals to make informed choices about sharing their information. Whether it’s subscribing to newsletters, participating in surveys, or allowing location tracking for mapping apps, individuals willingly contribute their data with an understanding of the benefits they will receive in return. This type of data forms the foundation of many legitimate and mutually beneficial interactions in the digital world.

The Impact on Data Quality

The distinction between creepy data and first-person data goes beyond ethics—it also has a direct impact on data quality. Creepy data, obtained through covert means, is prone to inaccuracies and incompleteness. Since individuals are unaware of their data being collected, they are less likely to provide accurate or comprehensive information. This can lead to a skewed and unreliable dataset, which can have negative consequences for businesses and organizations relying on such data for decision-making.

On the other hand, first-person data, obtained with full consent and cooperation, tends to be more accurate and complete. Individuals are more likely to provide truthful and detailed information when they understand the purpose and value of their data. As a result, first-person data enhances the overall quality of the dataset, making it a valuable asset for businesses seeking to understand their customers and improve their services.

The Ethical Imperative

In an era where data is both a powerful tool and a potential threat to privacy, the ethical imperative of distinguishing between creepy data and first-person data cannot be overstated. Respect for individuals’ rights and privacy should be at the forefront of any data collection and utilization strategy. Transparency, consent, and clear communication regarding data practices are essential to building trust and maintaining ethical standards.

Businesses and organizations that prioritize the use of first-person data not only demonstrate their commitment to ethical data practices but also benefit from higher data quality. When individuals willingly share their information, they do so with a greater sense of trust, knowing that their data will be used responsibly and for their benefit.

The Impact of Creepy Data on Customer Experience

Creepy data practices not only have ethical implications but also directly impact customer experience by eroding trust, causing discomfort, and potentially leading to legal issues. Here’s how:

1. Loss of Trust: When customers discover that a company has collected their personal information without their consent or knowledge, it erodes trust. This loss of trust can be hard to recover and can lead to customers avoiding or discontinuing their interactions with the company.
2. Privacy Concerns: Creepy data practices raise concerns about privacy. Customers may become worried that their personal information is being misused or mishandled, which can create a sense of unease and discomfort.
3. Annoyance: Receiving targeted advertisements or communications based on creepy data can be annoying for customers. It can make them feel like they are constantly under surveillance and that their online experiences are being manipulated.
4. Invasive Experiences: Creepy data collection methods, such as facial recognition or tracking of online activities, can create invasive and uncomfortable experiences for customers. They may feel like their every move is being monitored, leading to a sense of intrusion.
5. Reduced Engagement: Customers who are uncomfortable with a company’s data practices may disengage or limit their interactions. They might avoid providing personal information or participating in activities that would benefit both them and the company.
6. Negative Reputation: News of creepy data practices can spread quickly, damaging a company’s reputation. Customers are more likely to share negative experiences, which can deter potential customers from engaging with the company.
7. Legal Consequences: Creepy data practices can also lead to legal consequences if they violate data protection laws and regulations. Fines and legal actions can harm a company’s finances and reputation.

Companies must prioritize transparent and ethical data collection policies within their data governance framework to uphold positive customer relationships and safeguard their brand image.

The AIDA Framework: Attention, Interest, Desire, Action

To drive home the importance of this distinction, let’s apply the AIDA framework—Attention, Interest, Desire, Action—to both creepy data and first-person data:

• Attention: Creepy data captures attention, but not in a positive way. It raises concerns, triggers discomfort, and makes individuals wary of online interactions. In contrast, first-person data captures attention through transparency and clear communication, assuring users that their data is handled responsibly.
• Interest: Creepy data may generate interest due to its clandestine nature, but it often leads to distrust and disinterest in engaging with data-collecting entities. On the other hand, first-person data garners interest by fostering trust and providing individuals with a clear understanding of how their data will be used to improve their experiences.
• Desire: Creepy data fails to stimulate desire—it fosters a desire for privacy and control over personal information. In contrast, first-person data cultivates a desire for a mutually beneficial relationship, where individuals willingly share their data to receive personalized services and experiences.
• Action: Creepy data may prompt individuals to take action to protect their privacy, such as using ad-blockers or avoiding certain online services. First-person data, when handled ethically, encourages individuals to take action by willingly sharing their data to enjoy tailored experiences and benefits.

Conclusion

In the ever-evolving landscape of data collection and utilization, the distinction between creepy data and first-person data is paramount. It’s a line that separates ethical and responsible data practices from intrusive and unethical ones. Businesses and organizations that prioritize the collection of first-person data not only respect individual rights but also reap the rewards of improved data quality and increased trust among their user base.

As data continues to shape our digital lives, let us remember the ethical imperative: transparency, consent, and the responsible handling of data are not optional but essential components of a data-driven society that respects individual privacy and choice.

---

Is Data Quality important for Data Science? The answer is an unequivocal yes! Find out why and unleash your full data science potential.

Now, Find out how big data analytics eliminates sample errors. Understanding this dynamic reshapes your approach to analytics.

FAQs

What is the difference between creepy data and first-person data?

Creepy data refers to information collected about individuals without their knowledge or consent, often in an intrusive or unethical manner, while first-person data is willingly provided by individuals who are aware of what information they are sharing and for what purpose.

What is the difference between creepy data and third-person data?

Creepy data is gathered without individuals’ knowledge or consent and is often associated with intrusive practices, while third-person data is collected with awareness and consent, typically for legitimate purposes.

How does creepy data impact customer experience?

Creepy data practices not only have ethical implications but also directly impact customer experience by eroding trust, causing discomfort, and potentially leading to legal issues. Companies should prioritize transparent and ethical data collection methods to maintain positive customer relationships and protect their brand image.

How does creepy data impact data quality?

Creepy data, obtained through covert means, is prone to inaccuracies and incompleteness because individuals are unaware of their data being collected. This can lead to a skewed and unreliable dataset, negatively affecting decision-making.

What is the ethical imperative in data collection and utilization?

The ethical imperative involves respecting individuals’ rights and privacy, prioritizing transparency, consent, and clear communication regarding data practices to build trust and maintain ethical standards.

How does first-person data enhance data quality?

First-person data, obtained with full consent and cooperation, tends to be more accurate and complete. Individuals are more likely to provide truthful and detailed information when they understand the purpose and value of their data.